🔗 Share this article

These days present a quite unusual occurrence: the pioneering US parade of the caretakers. Their qualifications differ in their expertise and traits, but they all possess the common goal – to stop an Israeli violation, or even destruction, of the unstable ceasefire. After the war finished, there have been few occasions without at least one of the former president's delegates on the ground. Only in the last few days included the likes of Jared Kushner, Steve Witkoff, JD Vance and Marco Rubio – all appearing to execute their assignments.

The Israeli government occupies their time. In just a few days it initiated a set of operations in the region after the deaths of a pair of Israeli military soldiers – resulting, based on accounts, in dozens of local casualties. Multiple officials called for a restart of the fighting, and the Israeli parliament enacted a early measure to incorporate the West Bank. The US stance was somewhere ranging from “no” and “hell no.”

Yet in various respects, the Trump administration seems more focused on preserving the existing, uneasy stage of the truce than on progressing to the subsequent: the rebuilding of the Gaza Strip. When it comes to this, it appears the United States may have ambitions but no specific plans.

For now, it remains unknown when the suggested multinational oversight committee will truly begin operating, and the same goes for the appointed security force – or even the identity of its soldiers. On Tuesday, a US official declared the United States would not impose the membership of the international force on Israel. But if the prime minister's administration keeps to reject multiple options – as it did with the Turkish suggestion this week – what occurs next? There is also the opposite point: who will determine whether the troops supported by the Israelis are even prepared in the mission?

The matter of the duration it will take to demilitarize Hamas is equally vague. “Our hope in the leadership is that the multinational troops is intends to now assume responsibility in disarming Hamas,” remarked the official recently. “That’s may need a period.” Trump only emphasized the ambiguity, stating in an discussion a few days ago that there is no “fixed” schedule for Hamas to demilitarize. So, theoretically, the unknown members of this yet-to-be-formed global force could arrive in the territory while Hamas militants still wield influence. Are they dealing with a leadership or a guerrilla movement? These are just a few of the questions arising. Some might question what the result will be for ordinary residents as things stand, with Hamas continuing to attack its own adversaries and opposition.

Recent developments have once again highlighted the gaps of local reporting on each side of the Gaza boundary. Each source strives to scrutinize every possible perspective of Hamas’s breaches of the peace. And, in general, the reality that the organization has been hindering the repatriation of the bodies of slain Israeli hostages has taken over the coverage.

On the other hand, reporting of civilian fatalities in Gaza resulting from Israeli operations has received minimal focus – if at all. Take the Israeli retaliatory actions in the wake of a recent Rafah incident, in which a pair of soldiers were fatally wounded. While local officials stated dozens of deaths, Israeli media commentators questioned the “moderate response,” which targeted solely facilities.

This is not new. During the past weekend, Gaza’s information bureau alleged Israel of infringing the truce with Hamas 47 times after the ceasefire was implemented, killing dozens of Palestinians and injuring an additional 143. The claim appeared insignificant to the majority of Israeli news programmes – it was just ignored. Even information that eleven individuals of a local household were killed by Israeli soldiers a few days ago.

The emergency services stated the group had been attempting to go back to their residence in the Zeitoun area of Gaza City when the transport they were in was fired upon for reportedly going over the “demarcation line” that demarcates territories under Israeli military control. This boundary is invisible to the ordinary view and is visible just on charts and in official records – sometimes not accessible to everyday residents in the territory.

Yet this event hardly rated a mention in Israeli journalism. Channel 13 News mentioned it shortly on its website, citing an Israeli military representative who said that after a questionable vehicle was identified, troops discharged warning shots towards it, “but the transport continued to approach the forces in a fashion that created an immediate risk to them. The troops shot to neutralize the danger, in line with the ceasefire.” No casualties were claimed.

With such narrative, it is no surprise a lot of Israeli citizens think the group exclusively is to at fault for violating the truce. That view could lead to encouraging demands for a tougher approach in the region.

At some point – maybe sooner than expected – it will not be sufficient for all the president’s men to play kindergarten teachers, telling the Israeli government what to avoid. They will {have to|need