Utterly Exquisite! The Way Jilly Cooper Changed the Literary Landscape – One Bonkbuster at a Time
The beloved novelist Jilly Cooper, who passed away unexpectedly at the age of 88, racked up sales of 11m volumes of her various grand books over her 50-year career in writing. Beloved by every sensible person over a certain age (forty-five), she was brought to a younger audience last year with the TV adaptation of Rivals.
The Rutshire Chronicles
Longtime readers would have wanted to view the Rutshire chronicles in chronological order: commencing with Riders, first published in the mid-80s, in which the character Rupert Campbell-Black, rogue, heartbreaker, horse rider, is first introduced. But that’s a side note – what was striking about seeing Rivals as a binge-watch was how effectively Cooper’s universe had aged. The chronicles captured the eighties: the shoulder pads and puffball skirts; the preoccupation with social class; the upper class disdaining the Technicolored nouveau riche, both dismissing everyone else while they complained about how room-temperature their sparkling wine was; the gender dynamics, with inappropriate behavior and abuse so routine they were almost figures in their own right, a pair you could rely on to move the plot along.
While Cooper might have occupied this age fully, she was never the typical fish not seeing the ocean because it’s all around. She had a empathy and an keen insight that you could easily miss from her public persona. Every character, from the canine to the equine to her family to her French exchange’s brother, was always “utterly charming” – unless, that is, they were “absolutely divine”. People got harassed and further in Cooper’s work, but that was never OK – it’s remarkable how OK it is in many far more literary books of the era.
Social Strata and Personality
She was upper-middle-class, which for practical purposes meant that her parent had to work for a living, but she’d have characterized the strata more by their mores. The bourgeoisie worried about every little detail, all the time – what society might think, mainly – and the elite didn’t care a … well “such things”. She was raunchy, at times very much, but her language was never vulgar.
She’d narrate her family life in fairytale terms: “Father went to battle and Mom was deeply concerned”. They were both utterly beautiful, engaged in a lifelong love match, and this Cooper mirrored in her own union, to a editor of military histories, Leo Cooper. She was twenty-four, he was in his late twenties, the marriage wasn’t without hiccups (he was a bit of a shagger), but she was never less than at ease giving people the formula for a blissful partnership, which is creaking bed springs but (big reveal), they’re squeaking with all the laughter. He avoided reading her books – he tried Prudence once, when he had flu, and said it made him feel unwell. She took no offense, and said it was reciprocated: she wouldn’t be seen dead reading military history.
Always keep a diary – it’s very difficult, when you’re mid-twenties, to recollect what age 24 felt like
Initial Novels
Prudence (the late 70s) was the fifth volume in the Romance series, which began with Emily in the mid-70s. If you approached Cooper backwards, having begun in Rutshire, the initial books, also known as “the novels named after posh girls” – also Bella and Harriet – were close but no cigar, every male lead feeling like a prototype for Campbell-Black, every main character a little bit insipid. Plus, page for page (I haven’t actually run the numbers), there wasn’t as much sex in them. They were a bit uptight on topics of modesty, women always worrying that men would think they’re immoral, men saying batshit things about why they liked virgins (in much the same way, apparently, as a true gentleman always wants to be the initial to break a jar of coffee). I don’t know if I’d advise reading these stories at a young age. I assumed for a while that that is what affluent individuals really thought.
They were, however, incredibly well-crafted, effective romances, which is much harder than it appears. You lived Harriet’s unwanted pregnancy, Bella’s annoying relatives, Emily’s Scottish isolation – Cooper could guide you from an desperate moment to a jackpot of the emotions, and you could not ever, even in the beginning, put your finger on how she achieved it. Suddenly you’d be laughing at her highly specific descriptions of the sheets, the subsequently you’d have watery eyes and little understanding how they appeared.
Writing Wisdom
Asked how to be a author, Cooper frequently advised the kind of thing that the famous author would have said, if he could have been arsed to assist a beginner: utilize all five of your senses, say how things aromatic and seemed and sounded and tactile and flavored – it significantly enhances the narrative. But likely more helpful was: “Forever keep a diary – it’s very hard, when you’re 25, to recollect what age 24 felt like.” That’s one of the initial observations you observe, in the more extensive, more populated books, which have numerous female leads rather than just one, all with decidedly aristocratic names, unless they’re from the US, in which case they’re called a common name. Even an years apart of four years, between two sisters, between a male and a woman, you can hear in the conversation.
The Lost Manuscript
The historical account of Riders was so perfectly Jilly Cooper it might not have been real, except it certainly was true because London’s Evening Standard ran an appeal about it at the era: she completed the whole manuscript in 1970, well before the first books, carried it into the West End and forgot it on a vehicle. Some context has been purposely excluded of this story – what, for example, was so important in the urban area that you would abandon the sole version of your novel on a bus, which is not that far from forgetting your baby on a train? Surely an meeting, but what kind?
Cooper was wont to amp up her own disorder and haplessness